Site Header, Including Navigation and Logo

Cattle culled in GB because of TB since January 1st 2008

You are here: FAQs


The number of cattle tested for bovine TB in Great Britain in 2013. #tbfree


The number of new herds affected by bovine TB in Great Britain during 2013. #tbfree


The number of cattle culled due to bovine TB in Great Britain since Jan 1, 2008. #tbfree


What it's likely to cost the Welsh Assembly to vaccinate for five years in the Pembrokeshire hotspot area. #tbfree


The reduction in TB seen in New Zealand after it started culling possums in the early 1990s. #tbfree


The estimated proportion of TB breakdowns due to badgers in hotspot areas. #tbfree


The amount it will cost to control the disease in England in the next ten years, if no action is taken. #tbfree


Cattle tested in 2013 in England. #tbfree


New herds affected by bovine TB in England during 2013. #tbfree


The amount it has cost the taxpayer to control the disease in England in the past ten years. #tbfree


Has a role to play in the long-term, but it will not cure a badger that is already infected. #tbfree


The number of cattle culled due to TB in England since 2008. #tbfree


What are the most commonly asked questions about bovine TB? Where are the misconceptions? We've taken a look at everything from the history of the disease and its spread to current government policy.

TB beef cow 200px squareThere are links to further reading and the sources we've used included in the answers.

Not answered your question? We'll be updating this part of the site as issues emerge - keep an eye on #TBFree for details.


TB Free England twitter button_340_99

What is bovine TB?

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is an infectious disease of cattle.

Herd of beef cows_275_182It is caused by the bacterium Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis), which can also infect and cause TB in badgers, deer, goats, pigs, camelids (llamas and alpacas), dogs and cats, as well as many other mammals.

This disease is one of the biggest challenges facing the cattle farming industry today, particularly in the West and South West of England.

How does bovine TB affect me?

This disease situation has the potential to affect everyone, from those living in rural areas seeing the impact on farming neighbours first-hand, to people who enjoy great British beef and dairy products and want to see a thriving sector.

Cow at sunset 200pixEveryone will be paying for the costs of TB via the public purse, with costs set to rise to £1billion in the next ten years unless action is taken.

There is also the potential for TB to spill over into other species. While there are still very few cases of TB found in dogs and cats, it is on the increase in other animals, and particularly in alpacas.

Unless TB is reduced in the environment it is likely that these cases will continue to increase as the disease is forced to find new hosts.

What is the current situation?

The disease is spreading out of control.

There are now areas where the incidence of TB in cattle is persistent and high; these are called 'hotspots'. These are mostly centred in the South West and the West Midlands. However, as the disease is spreading there are more and more hotspots in places such as Cheshire, and increased areas across the East Midlands.

There has been a four-fold increase in the number of cattle slaughtered because of TB in the last 17 years. According to Animal Health statistics, in 1998 there were 6,000 cows slaughtered due to bTB in England. By 2013 this had risen to 26,603 cattle killed.


Since January 1 2008, 230,727 cattle have been killed due to bovine TB in Great Britain (Defra figures to April 2014).


tb stats Aug 14 gb cattle_600_374

When did bovine TB become a problem?

TB in humans became a significant problem in Victorian England as industrialisation crowded people together in insanitary conditions in large cities.

A history of bovine TB - screenshot_170_228At this time, many of the dairy herds that were kept in and around the cities to provide fresh milk became infected with bovine tuberculosis (bTB). The milk was a potent source of infection and many people died.

A law was passed making it illegal to sell tuberculosis milk and the tuberculin test, which could identify infected cattle before they showed symptoms, was developed. It was seen to have the potential to eradicate the disease and so the Attested Herd Scheme was introduced in 1935.

By 1950, herds that tested positive for the disease were compulsory slaughtered. This scheme involved regular compulsory testing of all cattle herds and the slaughter of bTB reactors, just as happens today.

It was at the NFU Conference in 1958 that the government announced, wrongly, that TB had been eradicated.

By the mid-1970s, all cattle herds in the UK were thought to have been cleared of bovine TB. However farmers in two areas, Cornwall and Gloucestershire, continued to see individual cattle test positive, despite having their herds cleared of the disease.

It is believed badgers harboured a reservoir of the disease and had begun to re-infect herds in those areas.

This situation continued at a low level throughout the 1970s. Unfortunately during the 1980s the number of cases started to rise again. This increase in number and geographical area has continued ever since so that bTB in cattle is once again widespread in England and Wales.

How much does bTB cost?

One pound coin on black background_170_255According to Defra, the estimated average cost of a bovine TB breakdown on a farm is £34,000.

Of this, it is estimated £20,000 is borne by the Government, mainly as compensation for animals compulsorily slaughtered and the costs of testing, and £14,000 falls to the farmer as a result of the loss of animals, on-farm costs of testing, and business disruption because of movement restrictions.

It has cost the tax payer £500 million to control the disease in England in the last 10 years. It is estimated that the costs of bovine TB control will top £1 billion over the next decade, if no action is taken.

How do farmers pay for bovine TB?

Farmers do pay, they pay a significant amount.

Cattle testing for Tb_275_182First of all they pay for the cattle control measures. Farmers in endemic areas routinely test their cattle every year, and in a breakdown situation (when bTB is confirmed in a herd) they are testing every 60 days. Even for those without TB in their herds, pre-movement testing is required before any animal can be moved off farm.

Testing requires additional labour and causes significant stress, often leading to injuries to both stock and those people handling them, but also results in loss of income because cows don’t milk as well and beef animals don’t put on as much weight.

It is widely recognised that the stress of handling can make animals more susceptible to other conditions and even cause pregnant cows to abort.

Government figures (see section 1.3) suggest that every time a farmer has a breakdown in the herd it will cost an average of £30,000, although this figure can vary enormously from farm-to-farm. Of that, around £10,000 falls upon the farm business itself.

An interim report published by the University of Exeter, looked at the costs of bTB breakdowns on eight case study farms from the South West of England.

Cattle_275_203One of the dairy farms used in the study, which lost 61 cows to bTB, estimated that the loss of these animals alone cost their farm £56,364 in milk sales. Consequential losses such as these are not recoverable by the affected farm business under the compensation scheme.

In addition, the money paid for animals which are slaughtered does not always truly reflect the value, particularly of breeding stock.

Herd restrictions put on trading animals after a breakdown can also be very expensive. Some farmers cannot sell animals and become overstocked, others cannot buy replacement stock to maintain their business and both situations can lead to big cash flow problems.

In addition, looking at the purely financial costs disregards the enormous emotional damage bTB does to farming families.

What impact does TB have on a farmer?

In 2009 the Farm Crisis Network conducted interviews and found that ‘dealing with bTB causes considerable stress to both farmers and their families’.

FCN Stress and Loss TB report - screenshot_170_240Some 20% of those interviewed admitted that they were either 'panicked' or 'devastated' by the news of a new outbreak, and a further 50% were 'upset' or 'worried'. Farmers told the FCN:

"The worst thing was that cows very close to calving had to be shot on farm. We could see the calves kicking inside as they died."

“I feel there is a constant dark cloud of uncertainty over me, causing stress, anxiety and fear. I feel weary, mentally and physically which results in pain in my body.”

“Financially it is very stressful. Cash flow is a huge problem. Having to keep animals when I would normally sell them puts more pressure on me, on my family, animal accommodation and feed costs. I don’t know how long we can keep going.”

The study found that many farmers were suffering financial impacts to their businesses, including a reduction in sales of beef and milk as a result of culled animals, increased labour and extra costs of feed and bedding, as they had to keep animals for longer.

Some farmers have become so weary and frustrated by repeated bTB outbreaks that they have decided to go out of beef or dairy production altogether.


TB Free England video: Mervin's story

What are farmers doing to limit bovine TB?

It is very difficult for a farmer to prevent a wild animal from coming into contact with his livestock either in the cattle sheds or out in a field, but farmers are working hard to prevent potential disease transmission.

Door showing reinforcements to deter badgers_275_1
Repairs to a door to keep badgers out
Fence showing reinforcement to deter badgers_275_1
Work to fencing to deter badgers
Gate reinforced to deter badgers_275_154
Badger-proof gate
Raised and wall-mounted drinking trough_275_184
Drinking trough raised and wall-mounted
Badger-proof feed store_275_154
Badger-proof feed store (open)

The measures that farmers take include raising feed and water troughs off the ground, ensuring doors to feed sheds fit well, and are kept shut at night, storing feed in covered bins and fencing off badger setts and latrines.

The only way of totally preventing infection would be to house cattle day and night, for 12 months of the year in secure premises and to sterilise all feed brought in.

The NFU, together with Defra, the Welsh Assembly Government and Food Environment and Research Agency (FERA), has developed a Bovine TB and Badgers - Improving Farm Biosecurity DVD which is being used to promote best practice.

Farmers also have access to independent advice from the South West TB Farm Advisory Service and through various events run by veterinary groups.

How is bovine TB spread?

Bovine TB is spread from cattle to badgers and badgers to cattle.

Badger and cows_275_154This is known as the cycle of reinfection.

The links between badgers, cattle and TB infection were first suspected in the early 1970s and both experience and experimentation has subsequently proved them beyond doubt. Professor Sir John Krebs concluded in his 1997 report that there was “compelling evidence” that badgers transmit bTB to cattle.

In addition, both the Zuckerman and Dunnet reports to government came to the conclusion that the badger is the most important wildlife reservoir and it is involved in the maintenance and transmission of the disease to cattle.

There is still some uncertainty surrounding bovine TB and the way it is transmitted, but it is mainly a respiratory disease, caught by breathing in the M. bovis bacteria that cause bovine TB. This usually happens when animals are in close contact with each other, so animal density is a major factor in the transmission of M. bovis. Bacteria released into the air through coughing and sneezing can spread the disease to uninfected animals.

Direct transmission can happen, eg through nose to nose contact. There is also evidence that indirect transmission is possible, eg through contact with saliva, urine, droppings, pus from abscesses, etc. We know bovine TB is transmitted from cattle to cattle; from badgers to cattle and cattle to badgers; and badger to badger.

The programme of trials that followed the Krebs report were designed to identify the most effective strategy for preventing bTB in badgers spreading into cattle populations.

Cattle movements are also part of the problem and have been linked to taking the disease to previously TB-free areas. However, evidence shows that, providing the wildlife is not also harbouring the disease, this doesn’t lead to a long-term TB problem. For example, Northumberland has had pockets of TB caused by cattle movements, but the level of infection has now dropped -as there is no substantial wildlife reservoir of the disease in this area.

The vast majority of bTB outbreaks occur in the 'hotspot' bTB areas of the South West and the West Midlands, and in these high-risk areas up to 50% can be attributed to localised transmission involving infected badgers.

How does TB move between badgers and cattle?

A badger with TB can infect cattle in several ways.

Badger latrine_275_206The primary route is inhalation, with cattle breathing in the bacteria from the air.

However, infection from cows eating contaminated material is also an important route.

Clinical sampling of live badgers has shown that bTB bacteria can be isolated from sputum, faeces, urine, bite wounds and draining abscesses. Badger latrine sites, where badgers urinate or defecate in fields, can contaminate grass with bacteria, which can then be transmitted to the cows when they graze.

Similarly, badgers mark their territory by urinating and this is often spread across cattle pastures.

Badger showing TB lesion_275_154If a badger has TB infection in its kidneys it will excrete a very high level of TB bacteria on to the grass. If an infected badger eats or drinks from cattle feed or water troughs, they can spread TB bacteria through their saliva, which infects the cows when they eat or drink from these contaminated sources.

Infected badgers can also spread the bacteria through open cuts and wounds.

Badger eating feed and cow_275_160There is also the potential for direct transmission of bacteria through nose-to-nose contact between badgers and cattle.

This can occur when badgers visit farm yards and there is substantial evidence to show close contact in farm buildings as well as regular visits from badgers to cattle feed stores.

How does TB affect cattle?

The stringent testing regime, and removal of cattle for compulsory slaughter if they test positive for TB, means that on-farm welfare implications for cows with TB are kept to a minimum.

Cows_275_184However the number of cows being culled because of bovine TB has increased four-fold in the past 17 years and has resulted in 100,000s of cows being killed before the end of their productive life. In England alone, the past five years have seen the number of cattle culled due to TB rise to 171,814 (Jan 2008 – May 2014).


TB Free England video: The calf

How does TB affect badgers?

The major cause of badger deaths, 50,000 each year according to the Badger Trust, is road accidents.

Pair of badgersHowever, in the hotspot areas, up to one in three badgers are estimated to have bovine TB (source: Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB).

Badgers spend most of their life below ground sharing the same air space, tunnels and chambers, which provides the perfect environment for the disease to spread within a social group.

As in cattle, the disease affects the lungs - but also the kidneys. Infected badgers experience more extensive development of TB lesions than cattle, and infected animals will lose weight and body condition and experience severe breathing problems which limit their ability to forage normally.

Badger showing TB lesionHowever, it has been shown that badgers can go through a period of 'latency' when the disease is present but makes little progress and it is their ability to live with the disease and to pass it on readily within the confines of their setts to other badgers and to cattle at pasture and around farm buildings that makes the badger an almost perfect host for bTB.

Can pet cats catch or spread bovine TB?

The Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency (AHVLA) reported in March 2014 that nine cats had contracted bovine TB in Berkshire and Hampshire in 2013.

Following screening of the people who came into contact with the infected cats, Public Health England and the AHVLA announced two humans developed bovine TB. This was the first documented case of cat to human transmission.

It is believed that the cats were infected with the disease after contact with wildlife, such as badgers or rats, although other methods such as cat-to-cat transmission cannot be ruled out.

There have been no further cases of bovine TB reported in the Berkshire and Hampshire area since March 2013, the disease is still uncommon in cats.


How can the spread of bovine TB be reduced?

The evidence shows that TB can be tackled successfully when all fronts of the disease are tackled at the same time.

Cattle testing for Tb_275_182This means using both cattle controls and badger controls in the hotspot areas; those areas where the disease is persistent and high.

Cattle herds in TB problem areas, and surrounding areas, are tested annually and cows that react to the test are put into isolation and slaughtered.

The remainder of the herd is subject to strict movement restrictions, meaning cows cannot move off farm, unless it is for slaughter, until the whole herd passes two consecutive TB tests over 120 days.

Despite the measures, the number of farms closed down with bovine TB is rising.

The number of cattle herds in England which were under restrictions because of a TB incident, at some time during the period January-November 2012, was 6,587. This is having a devastating impact on the British beef and dairy sectors.

Currently, TB infected badgers are not identified, treated or slaughtered, allowing the disease to build in this wildlife reservoir. It has developed to the extent that they can excrete vast numbers of bTB bacilli in their dung, urine and saliva which can then be ingested by cows.

As the evidence demonstrates that badgers do spread TB to cattle, and harbour a reservoir of this disease within the wildlife, it is important the government includes badger controls in its TB Eradication Plan.

This means that badgers will be culled in those hotspot areas where TB infection is persistent and high, to stop further spread.

The badger cull is not happening nationwide; there is no nationwide culling strategy.

Instead the cull will be licensed by Natural England and will begin with two pilot areas, to ensure that the method of controlled shooting is safe, effective and humane.

Once the pilots have been carried out successfully the policy will be extended to other hotspot areas in the South West, West Midlands and some parts of the East Midlands.

What is the government doing about bovine TB?

The Government published its Strategy for Achieving Officially TB Free Status for England on April 3 2014 in which it outlined its commitment to tackling TB using all the available options.

Houses of ParliamentSecretary of State Owen Paterson re-emphasised that controlling the disease in wildlife is an essential part of its strategy.

During his statement to Parliament on April 3 announcing the publication of the strategy, Mr Paterson also highlighted:

  • A scheme for vaccination projects around the edge of the most badly affected parts of the country in an attempt to create a buffer zone of TB immunity to stop the disease spreading further;
  • A trial of a comprehensive farm-level risk management programme throughout the cull areas over the next three years, which will be available to all farmers and will provide bespoke assessments and advice for farmers on how to protect cattle;
  • An investment of £24.6 million over the current Parliament in the development of effective TB vaccines for both cattle and badgers. Large scale field trials for a deployable cattle vaccine are currently being designed and work is also being carried out on an oral badger vaccine;
  • The stepping up of investment in the development of improved diagnostic tests to enable the identification and removal of only TB-infected badgers.

Has this approach been tried elsewhere?

The UK coalition government has decided on this multi-faceted approach because the science shows it will work. 

In addition, there is evidence from other countries which have significantly reduced TB by tackling all aspects of the infection cycle.

For example, the government in the Republic of Ireland has been conducting a badger control programme for the past 12 years. The number of cows testing positive to the TB test has fallen by more than a third during the past four years.

In 2008 Ireland had just under 30,000 reactor cattle. By 2012, the figure had fallen to 18,476.

A reactive badger control strategy has been used, removing badgers in areas surrounding new TB herd breakdowns. This measure is partly credited for the 50% reduction in TB incidence that has been seen in since 2000.

In Northern Ireland, where no badger culling takes place and similar cattle measures exist, TB incidence has risen over the same period and now reaches more than 7% of all cattle herds in the province.

TB Free graph, Ireland and TB_680_383

What about vaccinating cattle - or badgers?

Vaccination will be an important tool to help control bovine TB in the future.

Needle and vaccine x 150 on TB site backgroundBut the evidence suggests it will not work on its own – and where both cattle and badgers are concerned, a realistic programme remains a number of years away.

Vaccination won’t work on an animal that already has bovine TB, and no country in the world where wildlife carries the disease has eradicated it in cattle without tackling it in wildlife too.

Vaccination and cows

Cattle_600_398There are calls for cows to be vaccinated against bTB.

However there is no legal vaccine available. Currently the only option is the BCG vaccine (Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin – ref 1,2,3,4,5).

The problem is that at present it is impossible to distinguish between a BCG-vaccinated and TB-infected cow. And for this reason it is currently illegal under EU law to vaccinate cattle with the BCG jab.

Work is underway to devise a DIVA test (ref 6,7,8) - a test that can Differentiate between Infected and Vaccinated Animals. But even when this has been fully developed, it will need to go through EU and international approval.

The upshot is that most estimates say it will be ten years before vaccinating cattle is a realistic possibility (9).

On top of that, there's evidence to suggest that the BCG vaccine and DIVA test will not eradicate bovine TB on their own. A recent scientific study (10) concluded that the efficacy of the BCG vaccine in cattle was between 56% and 68%.

We know the BCG vaccination reduces the progression, severity and excretion of TB, resulting in reduced transmission between animals, but it is not perfect. And for any vaccine to eradicate a disease it is necessary to ensure that 80% of the target population are immunised. The current BCG vaccine just does not does not shape up.

Scientists have said that vaccination has to be used in combination with other measures, which must include dealing with the disease in badgers. You can read more about bovine TB and vaccination on the Defra site, here.

Field trials of a cattle vaccine and associated DIVA test are due to start in the UK in 2014.

Why isn’t a vaccine being used to protect badgers?

pair of badgers_600_398Most voices in the debate, including the NFU, fully support the development of vaccines for badgers.

However, the only vaccine available is an injectable form – and that presents problems.

You need to cage-trap the badgers to vaccinate them. And you have to it annually for period of at least five years.

The process is costly and needs to be carried out by people who have been on accredited courses. Every trap will have to be visited early in the morning, every day.

The Welsh Assembly has just completed its first year vaccinating badgers in the Pembrokeshire hotspot area. Costs per badger are likely to run to £662 per year for five years – a total of £3,310 per badger (11).

And here too, there are still question marks over the efficacy of the vaccine.

It will not cure a sick badger, one which is already infected with TB.

The science suggests the vaccine is most effective in very young animals, and less so in older subjects (12). Young badgers spend their early weeks in the sett, making it impossible to trap and vaccinate them and putting them at risk of infection before they emerge.

There is also no evidence as yet which shows that vaccinating a proportion of the badger population actually results in a reduced risk to cattle.

An oral bait vaccine is likely to offer the most successful route forwards. But this option is still some years away from becoming a part of any badger control plan, because there is no licensed or proven oral vaccine currently available.

  • Read more – A comprehensive range of references for this article can be found here.

Can badgers be vaccinated when cage trapped?

As part of the pilot cull, two methods are being used; controlled shooting and cage-trapping and shooting. Currently the only way to vaccinate a badger is via cage-trapping , using an injectable vaccine.

Bovine TB is endemic in the badger populations in large areas of the South West and West Midlands. Scientific evidence has shown that in these areas up to one-in-three badgers will have TB. This means that vaccinating badgers in these areas will have no impact on the levels of disease. A vaccine cannot cure a diseased animal.

Click here for more information about badger and cattle vaccination.

Pilot badger culls and bTB: what happened in 2013?

In February 2013, Natural England confirmed that all the criteria had been met to allow badger control operations to begin in the pilot areas of west Somerset and west Gloucestershire, for the purpose of preventing the spread of bovine TB.

Licences were granted for four years, with operations licensed to take place over a continuous six-week period between June 1 and November 30 for cage trapping and shooting and between June 1 and January 31 for controlled shooting. Both areas were overseen by independent experts who provided information for an Independent Expert Panel report on the two pilots.

In October 2013 the companies carrying out the pilot badger applied to Natural England for extensions to their six-week licences. A three-week licence extension was granted in Somerset and an eight-week licence extension in Gloucestershire after the Chief Vet advised the extensions would enhance disease control and achieve the earliest and greatest possible impact on bTB.

The three-week licence extension to the pilot badger cull in Somerset finished on November 1. The eight-week licence extension, granted by Natural England, was due to finish on December 18. However, after discussions between the cull company and Natural England, it was agreed the culling operations would stop on November 30 to coincide with the end of the cage trapping season.

Following the conclusion of the extensions, the Secretary of State, Owen Paterson, advised Parliament that the extended culling operation in Somerset would deliver clear disease control benefits as part of a four-year cull in the area. He also told Parliament the extended culling operation Gloucestershire had been successful in preparing the ground for a fully effective four-year cull.

What did the IEP report on the 2013 badger culls?

On April 3, 2014 the Secretary of State, Owen Paterson, published the Government’s 25-year TB Eradication Strategy together with the Independent Expert Panel’s report into the first year of the pilot badger culls in Somerset and Gloucestershire.

The Panel was appointed to assess whether the controlled shooting of badgers was safe, humane and effective. The panel made a number of recommendations regarding the operations of the pilot culls which Mr Paterson said would be implemented before culling restarts in 2014.

How will bovine TB be tackled in 2014?

In his statement to Parliament on April 3 the Secretary of State, Owen Paterson, confirmed that the two pilot culls in Somerset and Gloucestershire will continue in 2014.

He also revealed plans for the next 25 years which included cattle movement restrictions and vaccination programs on areas surrounding TB hotspots where TB is rife.

What is the current situation with TB in Wales?

Decisions relating to bovine TB sit within the Welsh government natural resources minister's portfolio.

Pair of badgersOn 20 March 2012, the Welsh Government announced a five-year badger vaccination programme in North Pembrokeshire.

In April 2014, the Welsh Government announced that 1,352 badgers had been vaccinated during the second year of the programme at a total cost of £926,784, or approximately £685 per badger. In the first year of the programme 1,424 badgers were vaccinated at a total cost of around £943,000, or approximately £662 per jab.

This could mean that over the five-year period of the programme, vaccination will cost in excess of £3,000 per vaccinated badger.

The Welsh government has not been able to determine the proportion of the population of badgers in the area that has been vaccinated.

Welsh farmers adhere to strict cattle controls. Measures include annual testing and pre-movement testing across the whole of Wales, stringent rules for restricted herds with regards to buying in replacements to make up for lost animals, and even tighter testing for herds neighbouring a bovine TB breakdown.

Statistics from Defra show that in 2013, 6,102 cattle were culled in Wales compared to 9,277 in 2012. The number of new herd incidents of TB also fell, from 1,112 in 2012 to 868 in 2013.

In welcoming the 2013 statistics, Welsh National Resources and Food Minister Alun Davies said: “I am delighted that overall the figures have come down. However, we cannot be certain that this is a long-term trend and there may still be more fluctuation in the figures.”.

Click here to see the latest TB statistics.

How many badgers are infected?

In 2007, as part of its final report on the Randomised Badger Culling Trials, the Independent Scientific Group on Cattle TB reported a 40% infection rate among badgers in the hotspot areas where the RBCT ran.

The Badger Trust and anti-badger cull groups currently quote the ISG as saying there was a 16% TB infection rate in badgers. However, this figure is based on initial post-mortems, rather than the final full post-mortem examinations.

The latter examinations did indeed find that 40% of the 1,600 badgers culled had visible TB lesions.

Is the badger an endangered species?

Legal gavel on tb site background_275_221No. Badgers first became protected in 1973 following the introduction of the Badger Act.

Badgers are protected not because they are in any way rare or endangered, but because of illegal badger baiting, which involves digging out setts and using dogs.

Subsequent laws have been introduced, such as the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, and have culminated in the Protection of Badgers Act 1992, protecting the sett as well as the badger.

A badger sett survey carried out by the Animal Health and Veterinary Laboratories Agency reported back in early 2014. It found that the number of badger colonies had doubled in the past 25 years.

There were at least 64,000 main setts in England in 2013, compared to 31,500 in 1988. The peer-reviewed study was published in Scientific Reports, a primary research publication from the publishers of Nature.

However, the researchers stressed that their remit had been setts and not badger numbers. Further research is expected in 2014.

If badgers have TB, why is the population rising?

Bovine TB is a chronic, wasting infection.

badger_275_183Animals (and humans) can suffer from it for many years before succumbing.

The nature of this disease is such that if it reaches the stages of chronic infection it will cause a debilitating and painful death to those animals that succumb to it.

However, it has been shown that badgers can go through a period of 'latency' when the disease is present but makes little progress. It is this ability to live with bovine TB and to pass it on within the confines of their setts, and to cattle at pasture and around farm buildings, that makes the badger an almost perfect host for bTB.

Disturbing badgers spreads TB. Is this true?

Evidence from the Randomised Badger Culling Trials showed that bovine TB could increase outside of cull areas as badgers leave them, taking the disease with them.

This is called the perturbation effect. In response to the lessons learned from the RBCT, the current Government TB Eradication plan has focused on using hard boundaries such a major roads, rivers and coast lines to ensure perturbation is kept to an absolute minimum.

The size of the current cull areas are at least 150KM² . This is in line with the Government TB Eradication plan and will help further reduce the risk of perturbation.

Who is paying for the pilot badger culls?

The pilot badger culls are being managed, organised and funded by farmers and landowners. These culls are part of a legal, licensed and lawful activity to reduce disease.

Policing costs are associated with the threat of illegal action by anti-cull activists.

How will badgers be culled humanely?

Operators will be required to follow best practice guidelines, undertake training and competence testing. Best practice guidance has been published for the two permitted methods of culling: cage trapping and shooting, and controlled shooting.

Independent monitoring will be undertaken to assess the humaneness of controlled shooting during the pilots. The development of the monitoring protocols has been overseen by a panel of independent experts. The monitoring will include field observations and post mortems.

A Defra spokesman said:

“The design of the study to assess humaneness of the badger culling pilots has been overseen by an independent expert panel, which includes expertise in animal welfare, badger ecology and wildlife population management. All marksmen are required to pass a government training course and must adhere to best practice guidance to ensure they can carry out the cull in a humane way. The humaneness of the pilots will be monitored through field observations and post mortems and a report will be drawn up by the independent panel at the end of the cull.”

Is there evidence that proves the plan will work?

The government’s TB Eradication Plan, and the decision of successive farming ministers to include badger controls, is based on scientific experience from the Randomised Badger Culling Trial (1998-2007).

It demonstrated four keys areas which need to be achieved to ensure the badger culls are carried out safely, humanely and effectively.

  1. Herd of beef cows_275_182Controls need to cover a large enough area in order to reduce disease so the current Government TB Eradication plan has said that no area under 150KM² will be included. The most recent follow-up work published by members of the ISG (Independent Science Group) from the RBCT has shown that the size of area needed for an effective cull is not as large as initially thought and that the benefits can be sustained for a number of years after the cull has taken place.
  2. The RBCT said that bovine TB could increase outside of the cull area as badgers leave it, taking the disease with them. This is called the perturbation effect. So the current Government TB Eradication plan has focused on using hard boundaries such a major roads, rivers and coast lines to ensure perturbation is kept to an absolute minimum.
  3. The report authors called for strict conditions to deliver an effective cull. The two pilot areas are being licensed by Natural England under the Badger Act for the purpose of disease control. The licences will be approved only once the licence criterion has been met by those applying for a licence. UPDATE: Natural England has now issued licences.
  4. The report questioned the cost-effectiveness of a cull and so the farming industry is working with Defra, Natural England and professional contractors to deliver the cull from the grassroots, using local knowledge and local networks. An industry led, funded and delivered method will save money.




I keep hearing about the 'RBCT' What is it?

The Randomised Badger Culling Trial, or RBCT, is a large-scale field trial that was set up to quantify the impact of culling badgers on incidence of TB in cattle, and to determine the effectiveness of strategies to reduce the risk of a TB cattle herd breakdown.

The RBCT represents nearly ten years of work (1998-2007) and nearly £50 million of taxpayers' money. It was started after the Krebs Review on Bovine TB in Cattle and Badgers which reported in 1997. It concluded that despite there being 'compelling' evidence that badgers were involved in transmitting infection to cattle, the development of a control policy was made difficult because the effectiveness of badger culling could not be quantified with the data available.

It therefore recommended that a large-scale field trial - the Randomised Badger Culling Trial, or RBCT - be set up to quantify the impact of culling badgers on incidence of TB in cattle, and to determine the effectiveness of strategies to reduce the risk of a TB cattle herd breakdown.

The results of this robust experimental trial are fully published and peer-reviewed and represent the most substantial and coherent evidence base for the evaluation of badger culling.

RBCT chart 2_339_379How did it work?
The trial was conducted in thirty 100km2 areas of South West and central England, each located in a high-risk area for cattle TB.

The 30 areas were grouped into ten sets of three, each called a triplet.

Within each triplet, one area was subjected to repeated (approximately annual) culling across all accessible/consent land (proactive culling). In another area the badgers were culled on a single occasion locally, on and near farmland where recent outbreaks of TB had occurred in cattle (reactive culling).

The remaining area received no culling (survey only) and acted as an experimental control with which the culling areas could be compared. Participating farmers were aware of the treatment being applied to their area (i.e. they were not blinded).

Results showed that from one year after the last proactive cull to 25 February 2011, incidence of confirmed breakdowns in proactive culling areas was 16% lower than in survey-only areas.

RBCT chart one_579_273

Will a badger cull really help to reduce TB in cows?

Dairy cows_170_254Yes. The latest figures derived by experts from the RBCT demonstrate that five years after culling ceased, the rate of infection of herds in the area decreased by 16%.

This work has also shown that the effects of perturbation seen in the initial analysis of the RBCT have significantly reduced, and also that the incidence of bTB in herds surrounding the area of a cull have remained the same.

Is a 16% reduction in cattle TB worth it?

Yes. The figure of 16% is the one used by the government because it is the only verified scientific figure, obtained from the RBCT.

question mark - square on tb site background_170_1There are a number of reasons why this figure is likely to be very pessimistic. The RBCT concluded that culling should take place on an area of at least 150km2, whereas the trials where done over an area of 100km.

Moreover the trial areas were circles without hard boundaries. And there is plenty of evidence that the culling was not done effectively or systematically enough, and was totally suspended in 2001 during the Foot and Mouth crisis. But even if the 16% figure is correct this would mean 47 fewer farms would succumb to the disease within the trial area.

The alternative to a cull would either be to do nothing and wait, quite possibly for ten years, for another solution, by which time the incidence of the disease would be even more severe and take even longer to control, or to vaccinate badgers.

This would be very ineffective and costly and there is absolutely no research data to indicate what the effect on the incidence in cattle would be.

Culling 70% of the badgers seems unnecessary?

The requirement to cull 70% of badgers in a control area was established by independent scientists following results from the RBCT. These results showed that on average across the 10 trial areas if you removed 70% of badgers there would be a significant impact on disease reduction in cattle.

The UK is a signatory to the Bern Convention of the Council of Europe which prohibits the local extinction of endangered or protected species. The Standing Committee of the Convention is satisfied that the planned control in England does not breach the terms of the Convention.

Would only infected badgers be culled?

Unfortunately not. There is no simple way to determine whether a badger has TB.

The only reliable method is by post-mortem examination. Failing that, as with cattle, by two tests separated by a number of days, which is completely impractical.

Badgers killed in the pilot culls will not be tested for bovine TB. The pilot culls are to test to see if the process is humane, safe and effective. 

That said, culling would only take place in areas of high TB incidence in badgers so a large proportion of the population would be infected.

What is the PCR test and how can it be used?

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay or test has the potential to be a rapid, inexpensive and very sensitive tool for identifying bTB infection.

Pipette and petrie dishesPCR detects small amounts of DNA from mixed samples, and this method is often combined with immuno-magnetic separation (IMS), which increases the concentration of the samples resulting in increased test sensitivity.

There is potential to use PCR with faecal and environmental samples. However, there has been limited validation work on PCR in badger samples. Research assessing the sensitivity of PCR in badger faecal samples is currently being carried out in the Republic of Ireland and the results from this project will be available in 2014/5.

Defra has funded research into PCR since 2007 to detect the M. bovis bacteria from environmental samples such as badger setts and latrines. While PCR has been demonstrated to identify M. bovis in spiked samples in the laboratory with 100% specificity (100% reliable that a positive test result means disease is present) and 97% sensitivity (97% successful at correctly identifying diseased samples), it has been found to be less sensitive for samples in the field.

pair of badgers_600_398In a smaller environmental study, real-time PCR was able to identify the disease in all 12 infected setts and latrines sampled. However, there has been criticism of using samples from the environment in this context. Infected badgers shed M. bovis intermittently which makes the interpretation of environmental samples more difficult.

The next stage is to determine how to apply the PCR assay for bTB surveillance of wildlife on a large scale.

Read more:

Why was an application made to extend the culls?

In October 2013 the companies carrying out the pilot badger culls in both Somerset and Gloucestershire applied to Natural England for extensions to their six-week licences.

The same month, Natural England granted a three-week licence extension to the company carrying out the pilot badger cull in Somerset. The extension was requested to enhance disease control after the area achieved 60 per cent of its 70 per cent of badgers target, which was set by scientists to ensure a reduction of TB in cattle.

The Chief Veterinary Officer advised that the cull in Somerset at 60 per cent would deliver clear disease benefits as part of a four-year cull. The additional period of time would help to enhance disease control.

Also in October 2013, Natural England granted an eight-week licence extension to the company carrying out the pilot badger cull in Gloucestershire.

The extension was requested to ensure continued disease control as part of the pilot badger cull operations.

The Chief Veterinary Officer advised that an extension would achieve the earliest and greatest possible impact on bTB in Gloucestershire and that culling over a four-year period in both pilot areas would help reduce bTB in cattle.

Is meat from cattle culled due to TB fit to eat?

Yes. Cattle slaughtered by Defra that have tested positive for bovine TB are allowed into the food chain provided they do not show tuberculosis lesions in more than one organ or body part.

Supply chain, shoppingDefra applies strict guidelines for processing meat from animals which have tested positive for bovine tuberculosis. These EU-wide regulations are based upon internationally-agreed guidelines and are the same as those followed by many countries around the world, including Ireland.

The Food Standards Agency inspects this process and ensures these products are fit to eat. It said recently that there was no record of humans contracting the disease through the consumption of meat and that careful safeguards surrounded the slaughtering and supply of meat to the food chain.

The European Food Safety Authority has described the threat of transmission through meat products as 'negligible'. And Defra has categorised reports in the past that humans could be at risk of contracting TB from eating meat as "irresponsible scaremongering".

Across Britain only 0.5-1.0% of human TB cases, fewer than 40 people a year, are related to Mycobacterium bovis. The majority of these cases occur in people over the age of 45 and, according to the NHS, were probably recurrences of decades-old infections contracted before milk pasteurisation and meat inspection were common in the UK.